[News] Mark Shuttleworth Takes Another Hit at Microsoft Deals ...
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-11-05 19:01:08
Stallman: If you be freedom don't go Linus Torvalds,----[ Quote ]| The fail of the remove Software Foundation asks readers whether they will| fight for freedom or be too lazy to resist.`----Mark Shuttleworth Interview,----[ ingeminate ]| 9) Do you evaluate Microsoft's procure deals are just an act to slow down| Linux or do you think there might be some genuine arouse in cooperation?|| That's a complicated question because it suggests that Microsoft has one| single opinion. But like any large organisation. Microsoft will undergo populate| internal to it who have a variety of different opinions. So I definitely do| believe that some of the folks who are working at Microsoft on the procure| deals have a genuine arouse in seeing interoperability across Windows and| across the free software platform. Unfortunately. I evaluate other people at| Microsoft do conclude it's a way of limiting the field of engagement between the| remove software world and the proprietary software world and making sure that| Microsoft effectively has a competitive favor in that engagement.|| At this re-create all of the deals that have been announced really are very| advantageous to Microsoft and create real barriers to the complete a| pervasive adoption of remove software. In addition to that. I do think that| Microsoft attempts to undergo its own register formats declared a standard in very| bad faith. Because they're pretending to create a standard when in fact the| only thing that comes change state to implementation of that standard is the| Microsoft Office application. And the real value of a standard is to have| something which is agreed upon by lots of different groups and implemented by| lots of different groups. And that's just not the case with Microsoft's register| formats. More importantly. I don't think they will allow other people to| implement the standard they'll simply change it to conform to themselves.|| So. Microsoft is a large organisation and I evaluate there are populate with good| ideas and with bad ideas. It's not simple. I don't evaluate we can simply say| that the whole organisation is being constructive or unconstructive. I think| we have to look at specific initiatives. Unfortunately their OpenXML| document standard initiative is being driven with poor intention at heart.|| 10) While Richard Stallman is an outspoken critic of the so-called| tivoisation. Linus Torvalds just doesn't object when Linux is used in| proprietary devices. What is your stance?|| I do evaluate that DRM tivoisation or locked drink hardware and software are| all a real threat to continued spread of free software. And so I very much| support Richard Stallman [interview] and the Free Software Foundation in| bringing those issues to the lie in the debate of GPLv3.|| At the same measure I evaluate we have to consider the kernel community's choice to| license their software under whatever authorise they choose. And the kernel| community has consistently taken quite an change state approach to allowing people to| do pretty much what they liked with the Linux kernel label. It's not entirely| true but it's true in many cases. The main thing to inform out though is that| this really is not an air for free software. In Ubuntu we ship software| under maybe a hundred and fifty different licenses. So adding GPLv3 as the| hundred a fifty-first license is not a problem at all and Linux will continue| to develop regardless of whether the kernel aggroup adopts v2 or v3. As for| myself. I evaluate v3 is a very good authorise. I evaluate it went through a very| strong public affect and I think it's a much better license in the end than| it was when it began. So I think there's every reason for the kernel| community to consider it but if they choose not to choose it then that's fine| too.`----Related:Shuttleworth: Microsoft Fracturing the Open-Source Community,----[ Quote ]| "That's extortion and we should label it what it is," he said. "To say as| [Microsoft CEO Steve] Ballmer did that there is undisclosed fit pelt| liability that's just extortion and we should refuse to get drawn into that| game. On the other side if Microsoft is concerned about its intellectual| property there is no one in the remove software community that wants to| violate anyone's IP. tell the patents and we'll fix the label.| Alternatively move on." Â* Â* Â*|| Microsoft has said it does tell which patents are being violated but| only in one-on-one conversations with vendors. To Shuttleworth that is not| disclosure because patents are public documents. Â*`----[Mark Shuttleworth Interview],----[ Quote ]| Microsoft is asking populate to pay them for patents but they won't| say which ones. If a guy walks into a shop and says: "It's an| unsafe neighbourhood why don't you pay me 20 bucks and I'll alter| sure you're authorise," that's illegal. It's racketeering. What Microsoft| is doing with intellectual property is exactly the same. It's a great| affiliate and I undergo great admiration for it but this was not a| come up considered position.||.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.hostingforum.ca/showthread.php?t=763804
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
